Talk:𐍅𐌹𐍃𐌺𐌰𐌿𐌽𐍃𐌹𐌽

I have a small question. Sometimes Germanologies are used in Gothic, for example, 𐌲𐌹𐌱𐌰𐌽 was used in the past here for 'to be', but this is only used in the German language, so it is changed to 𐍅𐌹𐍃𐌰𐌽. Your articles are good and extensive, but isn't the word order too English? Gothic word order would have been very similar to the old German ones and of the modern Germanic language. Just an advice.

In your article I read: at nahts/ 𐌰𐍄 𐌽𐌰𐌷𐍄𐍃, I think this isn't correct, as 'at' as a prefix for time exists in Gothic, but shouldn't be used in this context. In the dictionary of oe.eclipse.co.uk I read that:

(at a point in SPACE) at +acc.; (at a point in TIME) at +acc. or +dat.; (during the time of) and +acc.; "at sunrise" at urrinnandin sunnin;

As this is about the hours passing by at night, I think the accusative one is the most correct one. And according to the dictionary and should be used with an accusative case. This means that 'nahts' changes in: 'naht'. Otherwise, if it would be dative, 'nahts' would change in 'nahta'. Bokareis (talk) 19:45, 20 𐍅𐌰𐍂𐌼𐌼𐌴𐌽𐍉𐌸𐍃 2014 (UTC)

Start a discussion about 𐍅𐌹𐍃𐌺𐌰𐌿𐌽𐍃𐌹𐌽

Talk pages are where people discuss how to make content on Wikipedia the best that it can be. You can use this page to start a discussion with others about how to improve 𐍅𐌹𐍃𐌺𐌰𐌿𐌽𐍃𐌹𐌽.

Start a discussion